We’ve all had terrible meetings. The real trials of working life are the overdrawn, dull, or exasperating routine of meetings that take up a bulk of our time and yet accomplish nothing. They are the empty calories in our workplace diet - we may be doing something, but we add no value to our work.
Bad meetings aren’t just annoying — they have a very real impact on employee happiness. According to an article by MIT Sloan Management Review, the most crucial factor in job satisfaction was how employees felt about the effectiveness of meetings. Employees who attend longer and more unproductive meetings will be more dissatisfied with their jobs and have a higher chance of leaving the company.
So what is it about meetings that pushes people out the door? We list the three main culprits and actions you can take to eradicate your workplace from detrimentally bad meetings.
Two’s company, three is a crowd, and more than twenty people in a meeting is just asking for wasted time. Many companies fall into the trap of pulling more people into a meeting than necessary, but the more people get involved, the less engaged each person will be.
Social anthropologist Northcote Parkinson speculates that a meeting with five people is the most efficient. Above nine, productivity will deteriorate, as most people present will not be participating and are either doing other work or just plain daydreaming.
Actionable:
To ensure that the meeting goes as smoothly as possible, be strict with your invite list. Harvard Business Review states that these are the people to invite:
It may seem like common sense to have an objective for your meetings, but many still miss this crucial step.
Even if you may have a vague purpose in mind when calling for the meeting, not having an agenda written down and shared with the people involved is as good as wasting their time. They will not be aligned on the purpose of the meeting and no one will know what they have to achieve at the end of it. A simple 5-minute update meeting could turn into a 40-minute brainstorming session. A 15-minute discussion could include an extra 10 minutes of complaining.
Without direction, a short and sweet meeting succumbs quickly to confusion, procrastination, and chaos.
Actionable:
As a rule, the burden of setting an agenda falls on the person calling for the meeting. If it is a regular weekly or monthly team meeting, have a dedicated agenda-setter. This could either be the manager or a team lead.
The agenda will include:
If another point of discussion comes up, address it only after the meeting is over, or set another meeting for it. An agenda tool, like the one we have on Pigeonhole, will help keep everyone on track.
There is a misconception that there is only one way to hold meetings — a bunch of people sits around a table, with one person presenting while other people ask questions or keep quiet.
But just because we’ve always done meetings like this doesn’t mean that we have to keep using the same methods. CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos is well-known for his out-of-the-box meeting styles. Everyone has a moment of silence at the beginning of the meeting to read through a written six-page narrative memo - no bullet points allowed. Each company will have a unique method that works for them, but you won’t know what they are until you try different things.
Actionable:
Try new techniques in conducting your meeting once in a while. Here are some suggestions that could help get you started:
The more creative you get with it, the higher your chances are to discovering your team’s hidden potential.